in the fire control systems of the shipĪn integrated system should be built-in by default.Ī dedicated system is one that can be added to any ship.Īs for which should be better. >integrated imples that it is comprehensively. You say that and I also think of a gimmick coffer maker forced in just to say "look it does coffee!" and you can't change it because it's one model.Ī dedicated coffee machine would sound like a separate product with modularity so it can be improved The general tactic for Eradicators is to Burn Drive (because there is no real reason not to use the Pirate variant) at the enemy, let your machine guns build up some flux on their shield, dump your sabots in their face to overload them, and then rip their asshole open with your chainguns. Vulcan Cannons ONLY shoot at fighters and missiles, while DMGs are extremely good at short-range shield stripping on real ships. Swapping the missiles for Sabots and the guns for Assault Chainguns would be a lot better, as would filling the small lots with Dual Machine Guns. It's also cheaper to deploy into battle.įurther, the overall setup is long-range based, and while it's good that it's consistent, a shorter-range fit would be better. The base hull is a standard variant, which has the Accelerated Ammo Feeder ability, which is okay, but when you only have 3 real damage dealing weapons that benefit from it and they're mixing damage types, the Pirate variant with the Burn Drive ability is probably superior. Anti-shield missiles (ie Sabots) are generally better as even if they hit the target when its shield is down, they still do EMP damage and knock out guns/engines. Anti-armor missiles are generally not great as you can't control when exactly they will hit the target, so you might hit the shield and waste 75% of their damage. The guns are 2/3s kinetic (anti-shield) and 1/3 explosive (anti-armor). That OP could have been spent on more point defence, or more (and better) hullmods. DTC should honestly just be removed from the game because it's a noob trap.Īn excessive amount of OP is wasted on flux capacitors and vents. The built-in hullmod, Dedicated Targeting Core, is exclusive with and strictly inferior to Integrated Targeting Unit. What PD there is is in the wrong places, as they don't cover the rear of the ship, which is where fighters and salamander missiles will hit to take out the engines. Fitting shield-related hullmods is stupid on Low Tech ships. Low Tech ships prioritise armor over shields.
It was a big mistake, thanks for clarifying.Įradicator is a Low Tech ship. And I used it on a few other ships as well. >Ballistic rangefinder on your onlut does literally nothing Flaks don't get any bonus because they are PD weapons. Mediums get no bonus range because they are already over 900. The gauss+harpoon spam is legit, but Manticores are a much more efficient way of implementing it than caps.īallistic rangefinder on your onlut does literally nothing. I prefer to keep my fleet somewhat compact so I could know every ship by name. If you're rich enough to afford to drag onslaughts with you everywhere you go, you're rich enough to afford a couple tugs too. Non-XIV Legion is just a piece of shit unfortunately, I guess using it as a gauss platform is as good as anything.īuilding in aug drives was a mistake too. Officer should be aggresive and have elite polarized armor. Fill in all the weapon mounts, remove rangefinder and hardened shields, add heavy armor and resistant flux conduits. That's what it has all that hull and armor for. This ship is meant to burn drive in, unload on an enemy, vent into their face, repeat until everything's dead. Good idea with most ships, but not with onsluts. I guess you were trying to keep weapon flux somewhat equal to dissipation. Since I got a bigger carrier, I am planning to swap condors for something else.
I posted earlier iteration of it before, but it is default low-tech wall.
0 kommentar(er)
